Drama in Court As Lawyers Battle Over Who Will Represent Nnamdi Kanu

Nnamdi Kanu
 There was mild drama in court as Nnamdi Kanu's lawyers battled each other. 
Two legal practitioners, Gabriel  Egbule and Vincent Obetta, clashed at the Wuse II Magistrates’ Court over which of them should represent the detained Director of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, at the resumed hearing on his case on Wednesday resulting in a heated argument.
The drama continued when the three-count case for which Kanu is standing trial was called up, Egbule, who represented him at the time of arraignment, announced appearance, while Obetta, an Enugu-based legal practitioner, also announced appearance on behalf of the accused.
Egbule in order to avoid further clash and prove to the judge that he was counsel to Kanu, tendered a letter from Kanu’s wife to represent him in court. However, Obetta in proving his point, told the court that he received a consent letter from the father of the accused as well as the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to represent Kanu.
He explained that it was as a result of his inability to appear at the arraignment that Egbule was briefed to appear in his stead.
The detained leader of the IPOB is being prosecuted on a three-count charge of criminal conspiracy, intimidation and belonging to unlawful society which he pleaded not guilty.
Prosecution Counsel, Moses Idakwo informed the court that the accused was not in court, explaining their inability to produce him on the application challenging the jurisdiction of the court to try the matter.
In his ruling, Chief Magistrate Shuaibu Ahmed, said in a criminal trial it was binding on the prosecution to bring the accused to court as required by law.
Ahmed adjourned the case till November 23 to enable prosecution produce the accused and for Kanu to decide his legal representative among the two battling attorneys.